David Hynds has faced the accident at his work place and he got the compensation for his injuries for £70,000. It is reported that Mr David Hynds was working in the engineering firm, David Reekie and Sons. As he was working in the engineering firm located in Lincoln in 2008, he met with an accident when a cutting tool fell from the height of four meters on Mr Hynds and it trapped him between the girder support and ground.
Mr David Hynds, belong to Kilbarchan was injured during the routine working in the engineering firm and he tried to save himself from the girder support. During to process of getting free himself from the girder support, the cutting tool fell upon him and pressed him against the ground. After some time of struggling to get free from the weight of cutting tool, he was slid down from the tool. He was immediately shifted to the Lincoln County Hospital for necessary x-ray for his injuries. In the x-ray report, there was no sign of fractures in his body parts.
Mr David Hynds reported that he suffered severe pain in his spine due to compression of the girder support and the ground. The doctors diagnosed that he suffered from soft tissue injury and they provided him necessary medical treatment and advised him to go back to the work. Similarly, another assessment was taken in the Royal Alexandria Hospital in Paisley. The doctors carried out his medical treatment and advised him to take painkiller and go back to the work and do the light work prescribed by the medical experts.
Again in 2009, Mr Hynds stopped working with the complaint of pain in his body. His MRI scan was conducted which showed that he was suffering from compression deformity of spine and he will undergo a major surgery for the reconstruction of the affected parts of his body to make it correct. The surgery of the compression deformity of the spine was undertaken.
Mr Hynds filed a suit in the court for the compensation claim on medical ground as the work accident may result into his disability or he may face financial problems due to his work accident and he sought £500,000 as compensation amount for his pain and suffering. The court admitted his claim and ordered for grant of compensation claim to him for his sufferings. Due to his suffering and pain, he also got the replacement of his earnings and pension from his engineering firm, David Reekie and Sons.
While pronouncing the judgment of the case, the judge, Lord Glennie said that Mr Hynds had received life threatening and serious injuries which could endanger his life. He fought his case in the court but did not give any gesture that he was exaggerating the impact of the accident, which he received physically and psychologically. He gave good impression during his case that he was good witness of the case and he accepted all the decisions of the court regarding compensation claim on the ground of work accident.
A man killed in an accident with the train. It has been reported that a man collided with the train in the Richmond in US State of Virginia. As the train was in full speed and the man was walking on the track, the train struck against him and the man died on the spot. It also came to know that at the time of collision, the crossing lights were down and nothing can be seen. The train driver also could not see the man on the railway track. If he saw the man on track, he also could do nothing for him. The police arrived at the spot and registered the case but they also did not tell that what the person was doing on the tracking and why did he not move when he became aware of the arrival of the train.
The police took the dead body in their custody and they get the case registered and started their necessary investigation. Always train accidents are tragic as it is not possible for the train driver to stop the train at once by applying brakes as there is danger of tracking off the train. Some time the staff of the railway department involve in the train accident as they can commit the negligence to their duties which may result into fatal accident. These accidents may also result into loss of lives or human limbs as well as facing heavy medical bills, lost of work wages and health care requirements in the future.
If there is another person or the staff of the railway department involve in the accident and he causes the lose of lives or injuries, then it is better to file a negligence claim against such person in the court and demand for the justice. You can mention in your claim the mistake of other person and hold him responsible for the sufferings and pains cause medical bills or other expenses as well as loss of jobs or work due to disability or abnormality. You can seek protection from the accidents and losses and search for the professional and expert personal injury negligence lawyers to sue your case in the court.
There are various legal firms, which have brilliant background in dealing with medical negligence claims in the court and they have professional approach to finalize these cases. You can get help of internet and search for the suitable law firms to file the compensation claim in the court. You can also hire the services of injury lawyers, who have experience to handle such type of cases and know how to finalize these cases with the court or with the insurance companies. The injury lawyer can prove the fault of the railway staff in such particular cases in which the staff is responsible as the lights were down. If railway staff found involved in the negligence of this case then the concerned staff will be held responsible for this fatal incident. The court will also hold them responsible for making payment of the compensation claim.
Most of the female have to face very odd situation at their homes, which has been created mostly by their husbands or fewer from their fathers or brothers. Some of them have courage to approach to the court for want of justice and in some cases, they bear the situation and do not ask for the justice. Various organizations and NGOs have appeared to settle these problems and about all governments of the countries adopted various plans and policies to uproot these odd behaviors and save the women from injustice and cruelty of men.
Recently, the health board of Scotland has formulated a policy which will work for the betterment of the female staff to avoid the domestic sufferings and pains, which is being done with them at their homes. The organization like NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde has prepared some guidelines for their managers to follow it. These guidelines help them in the identification and support of the staff, which are already facing such problems. The study shows that one in five female staff members is facing the domestic abuse and Scottish government as well as women are supporting this approach to settle these problems. A campaign was launched to support the staff in which one participant has revealed that she also became victim of the cruelty and unjust behavior of her husband.
A visitor of Glasgow health center, who is now 59 years old, got married at the age of 16 years. She revealed that she suffered the physical, sexual and verbal pains for 26 years. She faced the cruel situation of injuries being received on her nose and her head was also split open. She got her treatment in the hospital and she did not show what had happened with her. Most of the women do not leave this relationship due to various reasons. Some of them sustain this relationship due to fear and embarrassment and they do not tell anything in their family especially with their parents. They want to protect the relationship and do not want to disturb their parents and other family members and tell her friends and colleague that everything is going well.
Some of the women want to carry on education of their children as separation will result into creating disturbances in their lives and affecting the education of their babies. In the developing countries, the situation is worse as the execution of legal formalities in such cases is not carried out. One of the affected women, Ms Garrity shared her horrible story with another health visitor. She started saving money from her income so that she can buy a flat but it took long time to gather sufficient amount for her purpose. Finally she bought a flat and she sighed of relief to come out of the cruel environment, where she lost precious years of her life. She said that such policies are useful for other women as this policy will support these domestic abuse affected women to get help and support and come out of the cruel life with unkind persons.
Source : BBC
The case for the revival of Chevron Deference was filed in the Supreme Court and the court issued an opinion for the actions of federal regulators with the majority of 6-3 judges. Justice Antonin Scalia has decided the case in favor of Federal Communication Commission. The Telecommunication act was formulated in 1996, according to which the ability of local and state authorities has regulated wireless on the sitting decisions. Now the claimant has filed the case for the action of local authorities on the sitting applications within suitable time.
FCC has adopted the view for issuance of declaratory ruling and said that the suitable time means the presumption of 90 days to carry out action on the collocation applications and on the other applications, they need 150 days. This ruling of FCC was challenged in the court by the city of Arlington. Supreme Court conducted the fifth circuit to support FCC. The Supreme Court larger bench maintained the majority decision and asked two questions including the stand of Congress on the issue and if not do so, then ensure construction of law. The court also asked Congress to make intention for filling the gaps, which were left through suspicion in the laws. When Congress see limited action from the agency then they have confirmed the capability to speak and when they see the prudence of the agency then they speak over the issue generally.
The court has said that the judges have issued the interim decision and they did not waste the time in making decision that the interpretation of the statutory provision of the case is come under jurisdiction or not. In this case, FCC has mentioned the suspicion in their jurisdiction. The court has also given references where jurisdiction of agency is applied on the Chevron. The court further said that any decision against FCC could help to change various decisions having connection with agencies. The majority of judge was of the opinion that the arguments go against FCC were used intentionally to demoralize Chevron.
This case was heard by the bench of judges in which Chief Justice Roberts, Kennedy and Alito showed disagree with the case and they also expressed their apprehension over the power exercised by the administrative agencies. They were also of the view that they must finalized that Congress had designated powers to any agency to verify any suspension. The Chief Justice wrote in his opinion that he thought that the standing of federal agencies did not misrepresent the power of the court to decide about the law.
Justice Breyer wrote in his opinion that there is an ambiguity about the decision of jurisdictional and non jurisdictional decision when this question is arisen that any agency can act within its constitutional authority. The ruling of FCC left spaces and these were filled with their own elucidation. Justice Breyer rejected this argument of the petitioner in the presence of saving clause and the presence of judicial review excluded FCC to follow the law. The opinion of Justice Breyer appeared to work as balance between the opposition and majority of bench.